Seven-Year Study: California’s Anti-Business Climate Inspires More Company Departures
Companies continue to leave California because of rising costs and concerns over the state’s hostile business environment, according to a new study that names companies and provides details of business disinvestments in the state.
Over the seven-year period that includes last year, the study by Spectrum Location Solutions estimates that 9,000 businesses disinvested in California. Some relocated completely while other kept their headquarters here but targeted out-of-state locations for expansions.
“Gov. Jerry Brown’s office routinely denies that business departures is a serious issue,” said Joseph Vranich, a site selection consultant, who prepared the report.
“The study shows that a total of 1,510 California disinvestment events have become public knowledge and we provide details on each and every event,” Vranich said. “Site selection experts I’ve been in touch with conservatively estimate that a minimum of five events fail to become known for every one that does, making it reasonable to conclude that about 9,000 California disinvestment events have occurred in the last seven years.”
The report did not count instances of a company opening a new out-of-state facility to tap a growing market, an act unrelated to California’s business environment. It also pointed to shortcomings in Federal and state reporting systems that result in underreporting of business migrations.
“Public officials can verify every event in the report on the Internet, which is a strength of the study,” Vranich said. “This public information argues against Sacramento’s plans for a ‘tsunami’ of new taxes, higher fees and more regulations.”
“It’s typical for companies leaving California to experience operating cost savings of 20 up to 35 percent,” said Vranich. “The appeal isn’t necessarily to the lowest-cost states, but to lower-cost states with the proper workforce.”
Capital diverted to out-of-state locations totaled $68 billion, only a small fraction of actual experience because only 16 percent of public source materials provided capital costs for the 1,510 events detailed in the report.
As California companies built or expanded facilities elsewhere they transferred more than capital – they also shifted jobs, machinery, taxable income, intellectual capital, training facilities and philanthropic investments.
“As California’s business climate worsens, chances are that more companies will seek places that are friendlier to business interests,” Vranich said.
The report is based exclusively on public information sources such as news stories and company reports to the U.S. Department of Labor, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the California Employment Development Dept. It’s rare for so much data to be gathered into one report.
“Businesses Continue to Leave California – A Seven-Year Review” available as a PDF here (374 pages):
One focus of this blog has been to address California’s hostility toward business. Joe Vranich of Spectrum Location Solutions helps companies find great locations in which to grow. Joe also is a keynote speaker on the challenges and benefits of businesses relocating out of high-tax, high-cost, over-regulated states. More information is available at Biography and Speaking Availability. On Twitter, Joe is known as @LocationConsultant.
© Excerpts from this blog may be used, but only if attribution is given to “Joseph Vranich of Spectrum Location Solutions in Irvine, Calif.”Explore posts in the same categories: Businesses leave California, Site Selection
Tags: Best States for Business, Business Leaves California, California Business Climate, California Regulations, Economic Development, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Santa Clara, Site Selection, Worst States for BusinessResponses are currently closed, but you can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.